Revisions for Challenging Textual Interpretation in Multilingual Legal Systems

Revision	Operations
12/09/2025 - 14:41 by francois@minit-l.com	Current revision

Télécharger l’article

Récupérer un fichier PDF de l'article en ligne

Télécharger le PDF

Sommaire

No. 1 - December 2023

Articles

Level playing field : les significations d'un discours justifiant l'action de l'Union

Francesco MARTUCCI

Le paiement, angle mort du développement des crypto-monnaies ?

Marie BOUTRON-COLLINOT, Anabel RIAÑO-SAAD

Les SPACs et le droit français

Thierry BONNEAU
Book reviews

Modèle d'un pluralisme doctrinal ?

Julie FERRERO

résumé article

By presenting the Swiss approach to statutory interpretation, ie the pragmatic pluralism of methodologies, this paper underlines that this is a good way for the judge to take into account a basic principle: different cultures, different languages produce different texts. Since the same idea cannot be expressed in the same way in different languages, one cannot stick to the wording in order to find the common meaning of all these various wordings. More visible in multilingual legal regimes, this principle applies, however, also to monolingual systems. It is not possible to stick to a 'clear' wording without a proto-interpretation of such wording through which the judge weighs all the approaches in order to get to a solution that reflects the underlying normative values.

Télécharger l’article

Sommaire

Archives

No. 1 - December 2023

résumé article